List the assessment methods to be used and the context and resources required for assessment. Copy and paste the relevant sections from the evidence guide below and then re-write these in plain English.
Elements describe the essential outcomes. | Performance criteria describe the performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. |
1 | Prepare for work | 1.1 | Receive and give shift handover |
| 1.2 | Identify work requirements |
| 1.3 | Identify and control hazards |
| 1.4 | Coordinate with appropriate personnel |
| 1.5 | Check for recent work undertaken on plant item |
| 1.6 | Note any outstanding/incomplete work |
| 1.7 | Check operational status of biotreater |
|
2 | Monitor and control the biotreater processes | 2.1 | Get information relevant to the operation of the biotreater |
| 2.2 | Complete routine checks, logs and paperwork taking appropriate action on unexpected readings |
| 2.3 | Keep feed as consistent as possible |
| 2.4 | Check performance of ancillaries, such as agitation |
| 2.5 | Recognise and interpret trends in biotreater data/appearance |
| 2.6 | Recognise the signs of potential and actual problems |
| 2.7 | Identify the consequences to the biotreater processes of the identified changes, trends and problems |
| 2.8 | Take appropriate action to minimise the impact of potential and actual problems |
|
3 | Ramp performance up/down | 3.1 | Anticipate significant changes in feed |
| 3.2 | Breed up/down biomass to prepare for change in feed by changing variables |
| 3.3 | Ramp changed feed at a rate suitable for the biotreater |
| 3.4 | Establish stable operation for new feed conditions |
|
4 | Maintain effectiveness of biotreater system | 4.1 | Monitor biotreater frequently and critically throughout shift using measured/indicated data and senses as appropriate |
| 4.2 | Identify impacts of any changes upstream and downstream |
| 4.3 | Recognise situations which may require action |
| 4.4 | Resolve routine problems |
| 4.5 | Take actions on other abnormal situations to make safe and have the situation resolved |
| 4.6 | Predict impact of a change in the processing plant on the biotreater and take appropriate action |
| 4.7 | Test trips and alarms as required in liaison with the panel operator |
|
5 | Manage impact of shutdowns on biotreater system | 5.1 | Identify type of shutdown required/occurring |
| 5.2 | Identify impact of type of shutdown on biotreater |
| 5.3 | Liaise with appropriate people for shutdown |
| 5.4 | Arrange to maintain adequate feed to biotreater for a short plant shutdown |
| 5.5 | Arrange to preserve adequate seed stock of microorganisms for long plant shutdown or shutdown of biotreater |
|
6 | Isolate and de-isolate biotreater | 6.1 | Complete any required pre-start checks |
| 6.2 | Start up/shut down biotreater according to the biotreater plant type and duty in liaison with other personnel |
| 6.3 | Isolate biotreater or components |
| 6.4 | Make safe for required work |
| 6.5 | Check biotreater is ready to be returned to service |
| 6.6 | De-isolate and prepare biotreater/components for return to service |
Evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy the requirements of the elements and performance criteria, and include the ability to:
start up and shut down the biotreater
monitor and adjust process variables to meet specifications
recognise early warning signs of equipment/processes needing attention or with potential problems
determine the most likely cause of routine problems
take appropriate action to ensure a timely return to full performance
distinguish between causes of problems/alarm/fault indications, including:
feed variations
instrument failure/wrong reading
electrical failure
mechanical failure
operational problem
isolate and de-isolate equipment
identify hazards and apply hazard control procedures.
Evidence must be provided that demonstrates knowledge of:
all items on a schematic of the biotreater system and the functions of each
the nature/condition of materials entering and leaving each stage of the process, the changes which have occurred in that stage and why they have occurred
the biochemical changes which are occurring in each stage and the methods of controlling them
methods of ramping up/down in response to feed changes and the advantages and disadvantages of each
hierarchy of control
hazards that may arise in the job/work environment, and:
their possible causes
potential consequences
appropriate risk controls.
The unit should be assessed holistically and the judgement of competence based on a holistic assessment of the evidence.
The collection of performance evidence:
should occur over a range of situations which include typical disruptions to normal, smooth operation of an operating plant
will typically include a supervisor/third-party report or other evidence, focusing on consistent performance and problem recognition and solving. A supervisor/third-party report must be prepared by someone who has a direct, relevant, current relationship with the person being assessed and who is in a position to form a judgement on workplace performance relevant to the unit of competency
must include the use of an appropriate industrial item of equipment requiring demonstration of operation, start-up and shutdown procedures and responding to problems
may use industry-based simulation for part only of the unit where safety, lack of opportunity or significant cost is an issue.
Assessment should occur in operational workplace situations. Where this is not possible, or where personal safety or environmental damage are limiting factors, assessment must occur in a sufficiently rigorous simulated environment reflecting realistic operational workplace conditions. This must cover all aspects of workplace performance, including environment, task skills, task management skills, contingency management skills and job role environment skills.
Assessment in a simulated environment should use evidence collected from one or more of:
walk-throughs
pilot plant operation
demonstration of skills
industry-based case studies/scenarios
‘what ifs’.
Knowledge evidence may be collected concurrently with performance evidence (provided a record is kept) or through an independent process, such as workbooks, written assessments or interviews (provided a record is kept).
Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language, literacy and numeracy requirements of the work being performed and the needs of the candidate.
Conditions for assessment must include access to all tools, equipment, materials and documentation required, including relevant workplace procedures, product and manufacturing specifications associated with this unit.
The regulatory framework will be reflected in workplace policies and procedures and is not required to be independently assessed.
Foundation skills are integral to competent performance of the unit and should not be assessed separately.
Assessors must satisfy the assessor competency requirements that are in place at the time of the assessment as set by the VET regulator.
In addition, the assessor or anyone acting in subject matter expert role in assessment must demonstrate both technical competency and currency. If the assessor cannot demonstrate technical competency and currency they must assess with a subject matter expert who does meet these requirements.
Technical competence can be demonstrated through one or more of:
relevant VET or other qualification/Statement of Attainment
appropriate workplace experience undertaking the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
appropriate workplace experience supervising/evaluating the type of work being assessed under routine and non-routine conditions
Currency can be demonstrated through one or more of:
being currently employed undertaking the type of work being assessed
being employed by the organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed and having maintained currency in accordance with that organisation’s policies and procedures
having consulted/had contact with an organisation undertaking the type of work being assessed within the last twelve months, the consultation/contact being related to assessment
conducting on-the-job training/assessments of the type of work being assessed
being an active member of a relevant professional body and participating in activities relevant to the assessment of this type of work.